SERMON PREACHED at HOLY TRINITY, RINGWOOD EAST
ORDINARY SUNDAY 29
(October 22nd) 1989
(incorporating baptism of Matthew)
I scripted this sermon with two introductory paragraphs
which I later omitted, presumably because they were not suited to the context
and added to the length. More than 35 years later I think the omission was wise
(!) but I kinda like what I was saying – maybe a message to myself rather than
to those who gathered that day? I'm not sure I achieved “new languages and images” but the thought was there.
I preface my thoughts by emphasising that it is the task of the Church to rediscover and re-present its doctrines for every generation. New languages and images have to be used to express the truth of Christianity just as new vehicles are used as our transport needs change.
But
we as Christians must test our claims – in each generation – by the double
yardstick of biblical witness and the tradition of the Church down through the
ages.
***
Baptism
represents a new start. When Nicodemus quizzed Jesus about the signs he was revealing
to the world, Jesus replied by saying that understanding, and full experience of
God, could come only to those who are born again. It is a message that has been
repeated and argued over by Christians ever since.
What
did Jesus mean? I want to stress that our experience of Jesus need not necessarily
begin with a clear conversion experience. Mine did, but others’ may not. But I
must emphasize too that the promises we make at our children’s baptisms and our
confirmations only become fully realised if we seek continually to enter into
full relationship with Jesus. We must pray through Jesus. We must explore the
scriptures to understand more fully the relationship between God and human
history. We must confess regularly our inadequacies before God. We must be
active in our allegiance to and involvement in the Church, the Body of Christ.
Baptism
is the way by which we enact or symbolize that beginning. Jesus was baptised in
order to symbolize his absolute identification with humanity in all its grot –
and to accentuate the beginning of his public ministry.
Jesus
describes the required commitment to him as one of being “born again.” It is no
coincidence that he and the Church adopted water as the sign of that rebirth. Birth
is a watery business.
Sigmund
Freud says that we spend our lives in the search for means to return to the
womb. Günter Grass, in his novel Cat and Mouse vividly depicts one character’s
enactment of this desire, as he constantly dives to enter a submerged wreck.
Freud may have been wrong in many details, but the similarity between tomb and
womb is emphasised in many cultures. It is in our death, it seems, that we are
finally brought once more into the womb.
Christianity
enacts this return to the womb in the rite of baptism. It is as though the one baptised
enters into the womb of God and is born from it. As the new Christian emerges
from the waters the people of God rejoice.
We receive and welcome you as an inheritor
with us of the Kingdom of God.
But
if tomb and womb are essentially the same we can say also that in that moment
there is enactment of resurrection. The baptizand enters into a momentary tomb
and emerges, at one with Christ’s resurrection, on the far side.
The
fulness of what we are doing in baptism becomes apparent only at the graveside.
It is at the graveside that we stand and defy death. We do not deny death. We
deny death’s finality. As we have emerged from the waters of God’s womb, and as
Christ on Easter Day emerges from the womb of death, the womb of Good Friday, so will we
and those we love emerge in God’s time from the womb at our deaths.
It
is to that hope, that joy, that we baptise our children.
It
is because we must be faithful to that hope that we must work to grow into
Christ.
It
is only because of that hope, as revealed in the agony, the death, yet the
emergence of Christ from the tomb-womb, that we have something to say in the
face of San Francisco,[1] of
Grafton,[2] or
of the death of our loved ones.
The
Lord be with you.
[1] The
Loma Prieta earthquake struck San Francisco on October 19th, 1989,
killing 63, 42 of whom died when the Cyprus St Viaduct collapse. .
[2] On
October 20th, 1989, 21 people were killed and 22 injured when
a semi-trailer and bus collided on the Pacific Highway near Grafton, NSW. At
the time it was Australia’s worst road transport disaster, though tragically it
was surpassed two months later, 200 kms further south on the same highway, when
two coaches collided head on near Kempsey, NSW, killing 35. Coroners
recommended that a dual carriageway be built, implementation of which took some
26 years.

No comments:
Post a Comment