Search This Blog

Saturday, 18 July 2026

on dust and love

 

dust and love
SERMON PREACHED AT HOLY TRINITY, RINGWOOD EAST
ELEVENTH ORDINARY SUNDAY (June 11th) 1989

 

READINGS


1 Kings 17:8-16 [17-24]

Psalm 146
Galatians 1:11-24
Luke 7:11-17

 

[When I turned to prepare this 1989 sermon for posting I noticed it was a bit helter-skelter.

Hmm.

The useful thing about keeping a diary is that it sometimes provides explanations.

In the few days before this Sunday, 37 years ago, daughter # 3 was born, and I was sole parenting her two older sisters and, presumably, running a parish. Though I did manage to note that Australia declared at 601 for 7, not England’s finest hour in cricket. I wasn’t a happy traveller! I support England.

Here’s hoping there may be a thought or two contained in it that is useful for you].

 

Jesus accepted a dinner invitation to the  house of an influential Pharisee, despite his priority to proclaim good news to the poor, despite his radical teaching that the poor are blessed because they reveal the nature of God. These priorities did not prevent him from accepting and enjoying the company of the rich and influential. The gospel is for them, too.

A woman burst in. The “bad name” by which she was known around town suggests she was a prostitute, though there is no firm evidence of this. She came with the probable intention of anointing the head of Jesus with her oil. But as she stood behind Jesus the emotion overcame her, and her overwhelming tears fell on the dusty feet of this charismatic teacher.

Already confused by her impetuosity, she was further embarrassed by wetting the teacher’s feet. Forgetting herself she knelt down, released the long hair by which she advertised her available sexuality on the streets of the town, and tried to dry the tears.

Emotion continued to overwhelm her, and she fervently kissed his feet, before anointing them with the oil she had brought. It is probable after such a display of confused emotion that she no longer felt able to stand and touch the head of this man, as she had longed to do. She failed, anointed only his feet.

The passage is saturate with sensuality, sexuality even. The woman brings to Jesus expensive ointment, bought with the earnings of her trade. She embraced Jesus with the hair and lips that had been embraced by countless men. She horrified her onlookers.

The rock-musical Superstar, while careless in its amalgamation of several female characters in the gospels, nevertheless captures this woman’s emotions well.

 

I don’t know how to love him,

what to do, how to please him.

He’s just a man,

and I’ve had so many men before.

He moves me so.

He scares me so.

 

The Pharisees were horrified, embarrassed, cynical. Their cynicism was based on failed logic: if Jesus were a prophet, he would know this woman to be a prostitute. He would boot her out.

It disturbs me that the popular image of Christianity in the West is one of middle class niceness. It disturbed me further to discover this week, in The Age, that Australian clergy in particular and churchpeople in general do not see their vocation or ministry as being in the wider world beyond the church. Like the Pharisees we see our ministry as being amongst the washed, the clean, the lovable.

It was the clean who failed to wash the feet of Jesus.

The Pharisee’s mistake – and ours – is to believe that a prophet must not get dirty. To believe that a prophet’s role is that of a soothsayer, Jesus ought to know “what this woman is.”

We Christians often fall into that trap, ascribing to Christians a sort of superhuman insight. Clairvoyance, perhaps. Jesus is not a clairvoyant. Ironically, he sees far more than the clairvoyant. He sees not the woman’s occupation but the genuine pain of her repentance. He does not seek to remain “clean.”

God is the God who reveals his nature primarily not in the temples or on the high mountains but in the squalor of a manger in a back street in a rural village.

And in red light districts or a dusty town.

Jesus does even more than forgive the woman, as if that were not enough. Before a gathered crowd of chauvinistic Pharisees, who thanked God each morning in their pious prayers, that they were not born a woman[1] – he tells the woman that it is her faith, her actions that have saved her. The step towards God’s love came from within her, not from the society of men around her that had forced her to the streets.

There is almost too much to learn from this brief passage in the life of Christ. But at the heart of it once more is the contrast between the expectation of middle class religiosity: that God will be best known in the clean places. The actuality in this passage is that it is this epitome of poverty, the woman forced to the streets, who best reveals the focussed love that God seeks in his people. Jesus gave to the woman, amidst her squalor, in the face of her brokenness, the best of God’s forgiving, loving, dignity-bestowing love.

 



[1] On this prayer, and its revisions, see https://www.anschechesed.org/tefillah-tuesday-not-make-woman/.

No comments: