Search This Blog

Friday, 24 April 2020

sighting Elvis?




Saturday
in the
Second Week of Easter
April 25th

With apologies if you wanted a refection on either ANZAC Day[1] or The Feast of St Mark. I am however keen to maintain continuity with the weekday Eucharistic readings.

READING: John 6: 16-21

When evening came, his disciples went down to the sea, got into a boat, and started across the sea to Capernaum. It was now dark, and Jesus had not yet come to them. The sea became rough because a strong wind was blowing. When they had rowed about three or four miles, they saw Jesus walking on the sea and coming near the boat, and they were terrified. But he said to them, “It is I [In Greek: I am] do not be afraid.” Then they wanted to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the land toward which they were going.


REFLECTION

I noted early in this series that I take a more or less “literary critical” and “reader-response” approach to scripture. This possibly needs expansion at some stage, but I may have pushed a friendship far enough already! When it comes to the “nature miracles” such as that of this passage my meaning will become a little more apparent: I believe that the critical issue here is not the “thinginess” of what happened, but the deeper truth that John is seeking to convey to his faith-community, and in the purposes of God, to us.

Again, there was a school of thought, particularly in the 1950s, that “de-miraculized” this passage altogether: Jesus was walking on stepping stones beneath the water’s surface, not visible in the dark to the frightened disciples (Peter and his net-fishing mates were smarter than that I think?). William Barclay, beloved of many, has Jesus walking “by the seashore,”[2] drawing in the author’s use of the same words at John 21:1. (Sadly at this point I cannot reach for more credible commentaries, currently under lock-down in Peter Mann house … another time, maybe). I am unconvinced.

There is anyway something here much more important than the mechanics of Jesus’ shortcut. The shortcut’s miraculous element has to be consistent with the first Christians’ experience of the risen Lord – remembering that John was writing decades later. While there have been a few sightings of Elvis, not many have been consistent with the experiences of those who knew him, especially Priscilla and Lisa Marie Presley. Claims were made about Hitler, too, with equal credibility. Perhaps standards of proof were less rigorous in John’s day, but for the gospel message that John treasured to seize hearts and minds, his story had to resonate with the expectations and experiences of the faithful. The experience John’s people had of the presence of the Risen Lord was powerful enough for them to be certain he was capable of subduing nature to his will, that his stakes on the divinity register, revealed in his life, death, teachings and above all their experience of his resurrection, was sufficiently powerful to give this most outrageous claim sufficient credibility to live and die for.

It is worth noting, too that the scene follows the feeding miracle I wrote about yesterday: social justice and mystical experience all rolled into one, and again consistent with the experience of John’s audience. It happens, too, after a powerful moment of prayer in Jesus’ journey; is John flagging the importance of connection with the energies of God in the times of trial (such as we are now experiencing)? Above all, John records Jesus’ powerful words to the (understandably) frightened disciples: “I am”. This is one of many “I am” sayings by Jesus (and there’s a few “I am not” by John the Baptist), The most remarkable is John 8:58, “before Abraham was, I am." For John to float that daring claim it had to be consistent with his audience’s experience of the Risen Lord.



[1] My thoughts on the ANZAC tradition can be seen at https://pivotalpokes.blogspot.com/2017/04/ and https://pivotalpokes.blogspot.com/2018/04/.
[2] Barclay, The Gospel of John (1975), 243.

No comments: