Search This Blog

Thursday, 30 October 2025

good news why?


MEDITATION AT St JOHN’S, EAST BENTLEIGH

GOOD FRIDAY (April 24th) 1987

 

 

I was recently asked by a boy of about twelve why today is called Good Friday. One of his classmates immediately provided the right answer – that the name was a corruption of the older name, “God’s Friday.”

But this very correct answer given by the second boy does little justice to the theological significance of the first boy’s question. Why is the tragic death of a cult hero executed in Palestine nearly two thousand years ago, “good news”? Because as Christians we accept the belief that Jesus is God, why do we claim that the death of our God on a cross, at the hands of corrupt humans, is “good”?

The Archbishop,[1] In his first mission address to us, spoke of a sermon that he had heard preached by a Christian clergyman, and lamented that it could have been preached by the adherent of any of the world’s great religions – let alone one of the world’s monotheistic religions. Sadly, I believe that far too much that is spoken from the Christian pulpit has nothing to do with the Christian gospel. Says St. Paul, “I preach Christ, and him crucified.” That is the Christian gospel, and any preaching that does not grapple with the events we recall today fails to stand up to Paul’s criteria.

We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ …

God from God, light from light,

true God from true God …

for our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate,

he suffered death and was buried.

 

At the very centre of our faith are two seemingly incompatible beliefs about Jesus. He was (and is) God, and he was (and is) human. He was (and is) as St. Anselm put it, the deus homo, the God-man. There is no more difficult tension to maintain in our faith. To emphasise Christ as God at the expense of his being human is heresy. To emphasise Christ as human to the exclusion of his being divine is heresy. Both heresies have surfaced again and again in the history of our faith. But why are they heresies, why does it matter?

If Christ were merely divine then he cannot die for us. His death is not the same as our death. His suffering is not the same as our suffering. The great modern atheists pronounced that God had died, and that human beings must therefore take responsibility for their existence in a universe without God. Were God to have died in such a way, merely, that is, to have drifted out of human experience, then there is for us no good news. God’s death, if it is as the atheists metaphorically proposed, leaves us alone and defenceless in an unfriendly universe, responsible to work out our own salvation. We have only to remember Auschwitz and Nagasaki to recall how horribly wrong human nature can be. If this nature is all we have to trust for our salvation then our present, to say nothing of our future, is bleak.

Those of us who faithfully watched Paradise Postponed[2] over the past several weeks may remember another powerful symbol of what came to be known in theological circles as the “death of God.” Dear old Simeon Simcox sincerely saw the Christian gospel in terms of the human drive for a better world, a world of equality between classes and races – and the sexes. Commendable though Simeon’s dreams and life were, he died knowing that his dream had failed, that God had not ushered in the age of equality he longed for. God had failed, and for Simeon’s son was effectively dead.

This though is not the good news death of God we come to recall today. Christ’s death is not good news if he is merely a divine hero, seeking to improve the world on our behalf. Were that the case, his death was in vain, for our world remains, as we can see only too clearly, enmeshed in sin.

Similarly, if Christ is merely human, we have no good news by which to make this Friday “good.” We may greatly admire in our century Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi, John F. Kennedy, or even John Lennon,[3] all who in their own ways sought to transform this world into a better place. Shocked as we might be by each of their tragic and unnecessary deaths, their lives have not ultimately changed society. Racism still survives, despite Martin Luther King’s great dream; the social evils Kennedy sought to eradicate continue, the colonial exploitation against which Ghandi spoke reemerges in new forms, the utopia of which Lennon sang to his generation is still as far away as ever.

But Jesus is the God-man. In his death both God and humanity are somehow mysteriously entwined, and humanity is provided with an answer to the problems of this world and of this life.

An answer? Does the death of Jesus provide an answer to the problem of human suffering? If God exists, we will constantly be asked, why is there suffering in the world? I believe our faith does have an answer to that question, but today we have a more urgent question still to answer: does so-called Good Friday provide meaning to life in the face of Nagasaki and Auschwitz, in the face of cancer, Aids, the road toll?

If Christ is God, then in the events of Thursday night and Good Friday suffering becomes an integral part of the experience of the godhead. God, as revealed to his people in the Old Testament, was never unmoved by suffering, but had never himself physically suffered. Emotionally, as the parent of a miscreant nation, but never physically. He is never the unmoved “God Out There” of the philosophers, but neither is he incarnate amongst his people, sharing physically in their plight. But in the incarnation, in becoming flesh of God in Christ, a new dimension is added to the experience of God, and to the relationship of God to humanity.

For the nails that pierce Christ’s hands are piercing God’s hands. The whips that scourge Christ’s back scourge God’s back. The vinegar offered to Christ is offered to God. The excruciating loneliness and sense of utter rejection experienced by Christ on the cross, my God, my God, why have you forsaken me, is likewise the experience of God the Father and God the Holy Spirit, as they in perfect union experience utter separation from God the Son. For the communication between. Father, Son, and Spirit is such that the pain of one is the pain of three, the joy of one is the joy of three, God is one in three.

Human experience then, is absorbed into the experience of God. God becomes present not only on Golgotha, but in all experience of human suffering: in Auschwitz, Nagasaki, in AIDS, cancer, starvation.

Where is God when it hurts? If God is merely “out there,” distant, unmoved, the God of the philosophers, then God offers no solution to pain. If God is merely the unmoved mover, then he is not the God revealed to us in Jesus Christ, not the God who makes this Friday Good Friday. Such a distant God is an impostor, and I for one want nothing to do with him. Were the God of Christianity this distant God I would rejoin the atheists, for even well intended humans provide more hope for the world than an unmoved, distant God.

But it is the Christian belief that God was in Christ. That the man on the cross in pain, hanging between two hardened criminals, is God on the Cross. The reason why we believe this is to be celebrated on Sunday.

To that day we look forward with longing. But let us first remember that the death and suffering that we shall all experience, you and I, is also part of the experience of the God who we have come to love and serve.

And therein lies the good news that makes this otherwise very black Friday Good Friday.

Now to him who suffered and died, and who was buried, who conquered, who was, is, and ever shall be God, we all honour and glory now and forever. Amen.



[1] David John Penman (1936-1989) was Archbishop of Melbourne from 1984-1989.  

[2] Based on a novel by John Mortimer, Paradise Postponed aired on BBCTV and the ABC over 11 episodes in 1985.

[3] I admit I was not a fan of John Lennon, but the elder daughter of my training vicar was!


No comments: