SERMON PREACHED AT St PAUL’S, ARROWTOWN,
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 8th, 2024
SECOND SUNDAY OF ADVENT
READINGS
For the Psalm, Luke 1: 68-79
Luke 3: 1-6
Luke
constructed his telling of the Jesus story carefully. He wanted to ensure that his
listeners knew that Jesus stood in the prophetic tradition of the Hebrews,
while simultaneously representing a new, a unique incursion of God into human
and cosmic history. Luke’s time scale is less universal than John’s and Mark’s
brilliantly ambiguous references to beginnings.
Luke
uses a more subtle literary, oratorical device. He addresses his Jesus account,
as well as Acts, his account of the miraculous spread of the gospel across the
Roman Empire, to a figure named Theophilus. Nothing is known of Theophilus, and
I subscribe to a school of thought that suggests he never existed. Luke is
giving an air of solemnity by referring to a weighty, socially important
recipient of his letter, designed to encourage the listeners that the account
is carefully crafted, and the story is reverberating in august circles.
By
this he intended to – and succeeded in – giving gravitas to his story, first of
Jesus and then of the work of the Spirit, in pushing the history-shattering
good news through time and space. But he plays with us – not for the sake of
cleverness, but to remind us that the Jesus story transcends time and space.
To
return to my much-favoured phrase from Dr. Who, his air of authenticity,
anchoring the story in “the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius, when Pontius
Pilate was governor,” is “timey wimey.” Our time scheme, our BC/AD, “before and
after Christ,” that has more recently become BCE/CE, “before or after the
common era,” didn’t exist until the sixth century. Luke uses a time scheme that
anchors time in relation to the rulers of the Empire.
Using
that scheme we would, I think be in the third year of King Charles. Or perhaps
the second year of Christopher Luxon.
But it’s less straightforward even than that. Luke uses different and contradictory anchor points for time: as if he wrote “in the 73rd year of Queen Elizabeth and the fourth year of Christopher Luxon.” That combination does not exist.
John
the Baptist appeared in time, yet out of and beyond time, and Luke wants us to
know that. It is as if Luke deliberately said we need to know that the salvation that John was
proclaiming, that Jesus brought, is not limited to a select and rarified group
but to all who will hear the good news. He pretends he is proclaiming to
Theophilus but knows he is proclaiming that news throughout populations and space
and time.
News
of new truth, new beginnings, new certainties in the hands of the one who will
soon receive baptism at the hands of the prickly prophet.
Why
does this matter? It matters because Luke was at pains to explain that the
ramifications of his message reached far beyond the limitations that the followers
of Jesus were wanting to set. That God is a God who moves beyond, outside and
around our expectations. It was as if Luke knew, by experience, the ways in
which as followers of Jesus would barricade his truths, reconstruct them in
images that were more suited to our ideas and prejudices. He did. His people
had always erred, and so have we, for we too are Luke’s people, Jesus-people.
He
then goes on, largely in Jesus’ own words, to tell the story of the one who
breaks our expectations of God. As these next months go on we will journey with
Jesus’ mould-breaking teachings, but in the meantime Luke is simply teaching to
be alert, ready and willing to have our eyes and ears opened in unexpected
ways.
The
implications for us are, as individuals, as parish, as diocese, are the same.
We are called to be Jesus-followers in many ways that will be unfamiliar to us.
Much that we have loved is being dismantled – our infrastructure, our music (as
we see today), our place not being the place that we once had in society.
Luke,
as he tells the story of Jesus, holds dear the words of the prophet, centuries
before: “See, I am doing a new thing! Now it springs up; do you not perceive
it? I am making a way in the wilderness and streams in the wasteland.”
No comments:
Post a Comment