Search This Blog

Friday, 27 July 2018

sand-papering the match ball of faith


SERMON PREACHED AT St PAUL’S, ARROWTOWN,
and St PETER’S, QUEENSTOWN
ORDINARY SUNDAY 17 (July 29th) 2018

READINGS:

2 Sam 11.1-15
Psalm 14
Ephesians 3.14-21
John 6.1-21



Even when I (briefly!) moved in fundamentalist Pentecostal circles, in the late 1970s, I felt deeply uncomfortable when I heard this psalm, and its near-counterpart in Psalm 53. It was delivered as a sort of spiritual QED, the definitive put-down to anyone who does not believe there is a God. Even in those heady first flushes of faith I felt uneasy. I had been an atheist, and admired then as I continue to admire today those who’s committed searching leads them to conclude that there is not and cannot be a God.
This is not the same as lazy disinterest. This is the weighing up of probability and eventual decision that, despite the complexity of the question, we must decide that we are going to live on in a universe without a Creator, without any external source or guide. It is a brave finding, and one in the end that I was and am unable to maintain. To those atheists I apologize that solitary texts have been torn from their context by adherents of Christian traditions, used as a weapon in a war of spiritual dogma.
The context of this psalm was far more complex that such sneering dismissal of atheism indicates. The psalmist was writing for those for whom there was no question that there is a God. His QED is more akin to what I would prefer to deliver to those who continue to practice within the context of faith, but who dismantle the faith of those around them. Such people declare that, for example, there is no such thing as resurrection (and you have heard me on that before) or that “God” is no more than a useful construct of human intellect.
While I am not altogether a believer in hell, I could despatch such as these to the Judecca, the deepest human realm of Dante’s Inferno. There they would meet with those who have used religious prestige to persecute and prey on the vulnerable. I am in good company: Saint Paul poured contempt on those who considered themselves strong enough in faith to trample on the beliefs of those more vulnerable, more dependent on God and God’s grace (see e.g. the heavy sarcasm of 2 Cor 12.9-12, 13.9). Resurrection may not be comprehensible, and never was, but to stand within a community of faith and debunk it from pulpits and other soapboxes (very different to expressing personal and understandable doubts) is a crime far more despicable than professing a love of cricket while sand-papering the match ball.
Contemporary evildoers akin to those of the psalm, then, are not atheists, but those who stand within a faith-filled world-view and then dismantle the faith and hope of believers. To stand with a family who have lost a child and declare only a bleak and empty universe, when such a family are clinging to some hope of future reunion, this is betrayal. It is not the same as standing and with those who have no other-worldly beliefs.  There are other ways for non-believers to find hope amidst grief, and we can affirm their search, with love.
Our psalm can be allied in a similar way to religious leaders who use their power within a faith-institution to build up their own wealth, prestige or sexual gratification. This is common, and is deeply evil. Those who exploit the poor with imposed prosperity gospels (be faithful to my version of God and grow rich), who impose tithing (a bitter distortion of Hebrew Scriptural teachings), those who use religious influence to gain sexual gratification, these are deeply evil; these are the focus of our psalm.
Such as these stand, as biblical commentator Hans-Joachim Krauss eloquently put it, under the “scrutinizing look of God.” Unless we completely cauterize our hearts and souls (and many, sadly do) that scrutinizing look is an uncomfortable place to stand. For those that do cauterize their souls I suggest there may be some awkward truths in the doctrine of divine judgement. That doctrine is often conveniently dismantled by those same people, modern day Sadducees.
Our primary task is to scrutinize our own lives. What in me is hypocritical, abusive, predatory? I’m not going to tell you! Yet I must always turn Krauss’s “scrutinizing look of God” on myself. What in me takes a chance on the universe and acts as if there is no scrutinizing look of God? Can I, having deadened that searing scrutiny, then exploit, abuse, pillage without fear of judgement? The truly great atheist, agnostic, Hindu or Muslim can utilise the same criterion. What in me exploits, abuses, pillages, lives comfortably at the expense of the comfort and security of others around me or others yet to come? Psalm 14 put that question to us, not to the authentic adherent of other faiths or none. Psalm 14 challenges hypocrisy, not, as was implied when I moved in fundamentalist circles all those years ago, honest dis- or unbelief.
Our liturgy implies that. This is why we undergo a representative rite of confession before we break open the word – or, I suggest in Lent and Advent, after we have broken open the word. We have undertaken that symbolic rite today. So where now – if for a moment we accept that we have opened our lives to the scrutinizing look of God?
The psalmist recognizes that the prevalence of religious hypocrisy should throw us back on our knees. He challenges us to pray that God will exorcise the double standards in our own lives. In liturgy we go on to enter a sort of pre-enactment of the grace-filled world to which God’s energies are drawing us, the world in which we gather with all redeemed sinners and hypocrites around the table of God.  We gather knowing that God is drawing us towards that glorious, all-inclusive eternity. The processes remain mystery und unfulfilled as yet, but we will remember that we personally are unworthy and need a whole lot of fine-tuning in our lives. We should remember and lament too that there is some spectacular evil-doing still continued in the name of Christ, not least by those who use the name of Jesus to exploit others to buy their Lear jets, or build their mansions, or satisfy their depraved appetites.
Having pre-enacted that completion we will offer our flawed selves, “soul and body,” to go out in the world and live out God’s love and justice. To the author of Ephesians that means we go out, having “bent our knees to the Father” and touched “the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge.” We go out to be channels of the power not of our own egos but of “him who is able to accomplish abundantly far more than all we can ask or imagine.” Then and only then can our self-sacrificing love begin to be that love that feeds the bellies and the souls of the thousands who are hungry on the hillsides of human existence.[1] May we go out cleansed of all hypocrisy and renewed in the faith of Christ.

TLBWY


[1] See – I did preach on the gospel passage!

No comments: