SERMON PREACHED AT THE CATHEDRAL OF St
JOHN THE EVANGELIST, WAIAPU
(NAPIER, NEW ZEALAND: first cathedral to
see the sun)FIRST SUNDAY IN ADVENT (1st December) 2013
Readings: Isaiah 2.1-5
Psalm
122Romans 13.11-14
Matthew 24.36-44
The prophetic literature was
a rich resource. Over and again, centuries before Christ, the prophets had cast
their thoughts to the future, telling of a time when a person, chosen by God,
would come to redeem the wayward and hurting Hebrews. Sometimes they predicted
this Coming One as a kingly figure, sometimes, bizarrely, the later Isaiah
appears to depict him as a suffering servant figure. Other portrayals emerge
too, not all but many resonating with the Christians’ experience of the risen
Christ. They expected this figure, who they rapidly identified not only as the
historical Jesus of Nazareth, but as uniquely “Son” and “Lord”, to wind up human
and even cosmic history. They knew too that the completion of that project
still lay ahead of them, nearby or far off, and that they must weave a doctrine
not only of “coming” but of “second coming” into their understanding of the universe.
It is this complexity that we explore in our Advent journeying.
Complex it is. The long
passage of time since the events of our New Testament means that any sense of
second coming was for centuries repressed in all but the wackiest of Christian
teaching. At most preparation for the
encounter with Christ was relegated to a sense of personal encounter with God
in some form at the hour of our death or perhaps some future day of judgement –
the dies irae so beloved by Mozart. We
can retain that sense, but since that dreadful day when the obscenely named
Trinity Bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert, humanity has been far more
acutely aware of its own capacity to destroy itself. Since July 16th
1945 we have had at our hands the means of our own destruction. Subsequent
ecological crises, in particular those of increasing rates of species annihilation
and accelerated climate change serve to remind us that the sword of Damocles dwells
with us all, corporately as well as individually. At the same time most of us remain reasonably
well aware of our own mortality, too, at least after we reach the milestones of
middle.
Christians – though they
were by no means the first to do so – linked mortality, immortality and
judgement in an unbreakable chain, and saw that the events of the life, death
and resurrection, and the hoped for return of Jesus of Nazareth were inseparably
linked with all these dimensions of their experience. Post-Enlightenment
generations of Christianity have produced some degrees of scepticism about any
dimension of existence beyond that which we can physically measure and
experience, either in the life of Jesus or in our own future, but we hold
Enlightenment values over the head of God at great peril. A god who is quantifiable,
beholden to our tiny apparatuses of analysis, is frankly risible, and is not
the God that I find pulsing through the veins of the scriptures of our faith. As the early Christians turned for example to
Isaiah and his great vision of a future interpreted, transformed and blessed by
the creating and calling God, they did not see that future spluttering to
completion in their own dying. They saw a God who reached beyond human
comprehension, who their successor in faith would one day describe as possessing
treasures beyond that which “human eye has seen or ear heard or heart
conceived.” They found in the Isaiah-writings, for example, a God who would
transform the shattering of human experience through which the Hebrews were to
travel, eventually turning “swords to ploughshares, and … spears into pruning
hooks.”
Was Isaiah speaking only of
a transformation of present experience? Was he looking only to a time when his
people returned to the holy Hill of Zion, free to live at peace without threat
from bullying neighbours? Was Isaiah’s
vision of no more than a transformation of the political map of the Middle East
seven centuries before Christ? Or indeed, was he speaking only of peace and
justice at a global level – the eradication of military and fiscal disparity
and oppression? Was his beatific vision – as yet unfulfilled we might add –
only of Israel and for example Egypt or Babylon shaking hands and living
together in peace? The Christians were adamant that in the events they had
witnessed or heard of and experienced in worship, fellowship and exploration of
scripture there was a greater reconciliation: that not merely Egypt or Rome or
Babylon but all oppression and injustice, even the oppression and injustice by
mortality and death itself, was conquered. It was for this they were prepared to live and
die, certain that the resounding “no” of death was not the final word.
So, then, the seemingly terrifying
imagery of apocalyptic, in all its weird and wonderful but in reality totally
accessible codes of fearsome figures and events, was no more than the language of
encouragement. As Luther would put it centuries later, Though devils all the world should fill, all eager to
devour us. We tremble not, we fear no ill, they shall not overpower us. Or, in less poetic language, no matter how great the
evils that befall us – and they might – sorrow and separation and suffering and
death are not the final word, but the precursor to God’s glorious and incomprehensible
action of loving judgement and restoration, the “yes” that conquers every “no.”
It is to rehearse that dimension
of hope, the dimension of a God whose love transforms all mortal experience,
that we are commissioned in Advent. We prepare to hear, both personally and
cosmically, God’s beckoning words, as the author of Revelation put it, “come,
all you who are thirsty.”
No comments:
Post a Comment