SERMON
PREACHED at St NICHOLAS’, WAVERLEY (OTAGO)
TRINITY
SUNDAY (30th May) 2021
Readings
Isaiah 6:1-8
Psalm 29
Romans 8:12-17
John 3: 1-17
It’s an old tale, possibly
true, that clergy who were able to do so loved to flick pass preachments on Trinity
Sunday to their curates, placing the Doctrine of the Trinity in the too-hard
basket for their own repertoire. To my embarrassment, when I looked back on my
preaching in early years I found that I had often done something similar. In my
case, as I am something that some of you will know as an extreme “P” on Myers
Briggs co-ordinates, it was nothing to do with organising a systematic, annual
flick-pass. I was never organised enough to arrange such a thing, never organised
enough to realise that such and such a date on the rosters was Trinity Sunday.
It wasn’t until Anne and I were working together in a New South Wales parish and
I managed – accidentally – to be 1500 kilometres away visiting my children,
that she pointed out that I had left the mysteries of the Holy Trinity to her.
I was gutted: I am deeply committed to this central Christian doctrine, to the
extent that I believe that it is, together with the Resurrection, the doctrine
by which we stand or fall as an identifiable faith.
Which does not mean I think it’s
a matter of turn or burn. I don’t think God is greatly in the business of
burning anyone. But that is – to some extent – a different story. To some
extent.
Still: it is a large jump from
the mostly simple God-language of the New Testament to the complex and often
dull recitation of the Nicene Creed. On the other hand, I don’t think the Holy
Spirit of Pentecost went on holiday after the closure of the New Testament.
That work of revealing the heart of God was not something from which she takes
a Sabbatical. It is a large jump because the context was changing, and the experiential
simplicity of the first Christians was needing greater explanation and
explication if it were to survive in a complex and often cynical, crumbling
Roman Empire. Or in the twenty-first century. And anyway, does recitation of the
Creed have to be dull? Might it not be a song of joy, spoken or even sung? As an
erstwhile atheist I have never found the words “I believe” to be dull. After 44
years of stumbling but rewarding faith they remain words that astound me. I
believe. I believe. We
believe.
Still, I have too often worked
with clergy and other church leaders whose approach is that the creed is to
dismiss it as long, boring, and to declare that the Trinity has nothing to do
with the gospel. Where do I go to howl in fury? Or is it to weep in sorrow?
Many years ago, when Anne as an
undergraduate, she was friendly with a young Muslim student. They knew each
other well – I suspect he had the hots for her – and one day he declared that
he could accept Christianity if Christians would do away with the awkward
teachings about the divinity of Jesus and the triunity of God. He had a point: what
we had left could easily translate into a Muslim world view – or a Jehovah’s
witness worldview, a Jewish worldview, a Muslim worldview or dare I say it a Masonic
worldview (so much a part of our Anglican and other non-Roman Catholic
backstories, as Bishop Nevill would remind us). But we would not have
Christianity. Again: this is not to say God is in the business of burning those
with other worldviews: “there are others, not of this flock,” says Jesus, and
some early Christians dared to remind us that it is God’s will that all, not
just some, who are to be embraced in the eternities of God.
Have you noticed – as I’m sure
you have – that Nicodemus came to Jesus by night? Darkness is always
significant in John’s telling of the Jesus story. But darkness is not the end
of the Nicodemus story. Slowly as he sees the fullness of Jesus, the light shines
in his darkness. Those words should be familiar, too. It is Nicodemus whose
love for Jesus has him carrying 50 kilos of spices to anoint the dead man’s
body. Nicodemus learns to love Jesus.
The language of the Trinity is language
of love, too. Over years and decades the early Christians reflected and reflected
more on the hold of love that Jesus had for them. More than that, they
reflected too on the deep experience of his loving presence that they had
continued to have since the strange events of resurrection and ascension. Paul
spent about a decade and a half reflecting theologically and spiritually,
trying to understand the Hebrew Scriptures in the light of his own powerful original
and then on-going experience of the Risen Christ. Slowly the language and what
we might wrongly call the mechanics of the Trinity began to form in his and
other Christians’ minds. And always their reflections were driven not by some
need to make equations of the head but by their deeper need to express the
equations of the heart. The language of the Trinity is the language of love.
The unseeable, unreachable Creator God, drawn near. The integrity of the human
Jesus, in flesh and in subsequent Spirit, was so powerful that Jesus could be
no less than God, no less than all we need to know of God. The presence of that
long-ago human being not long ago but very, very now – very, very now despite
his invisibility. That presence in sacraments, present in fellowship, present
even in the words of Scripture. That presence, that both the gospel writer Luke
and John Wesley would call “strangely warming,” was life-transforming and death
transforming. and slowly the revelation of Triunity formed in the Christian
mind, formed as a marriage of head and heart.
In the end does it matter? I
believe it does. Again, it matters not as a ticket to ride to some eternal
bliss, denied to those who don’t have it, some ticket to a train that carries
only the righteous and the holy. Far from it.
The Trinity matters because God
is revealed in the tender, patient Jesus who engages with Nicodemus until Nicodemus
finally finds that light that shines in darkness. Jesus who heals a centurion’s
dying daughter, who heals a man’s blindness, a crippled woman, a demoniac, a
hungry crowd. Jesus who touches and transforms, showing justice and compassion
consistent with his teachings. Jesus who, as Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea
and a handful of weeping women eventually discover, heals even the obscenities
of death and bereavement.
The Creator is inseparably entwined
with the man Jesus, made known in space and time by the Spirit … not a
far-flung architect of the universe or master craftsman who remains at the
outer edge of time, but a compassionate loving God who enters yo
ur life and
death and my life and death and the life and death of those we love and care for
and turns all into the glorious hope of the new heavens and the new earth, the
hope of resurrection.
There is though one final
catch. For we are called so to immerse ourselves in the community of the Trinity,
in the love of and from Creator, Redeemer, Giver of life, that we too bring
resurrection hope and justice and compassion to those around us, that we too
become ambassadors of justice and compassion, a people of light that transcends
all darkness, that we too become a Good News People in a world that is somewhat
short of anything but un-good news.